On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:45:59PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 17.12.2012 15:57, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the files in src/util are 50/50 split between those
> > having a 'vir' prefix and those which don't. Finish the job
> > by remaining all remaining files to have a 'vir' prefix too,
> > guaranteeing that they can't clash with system headers[1].
> >
> > The only case which was not a plain rename, was merging
> > processinfo.{c,h} into the virprocess.{c,h} since the
> > functionality logically belongs together.
> >
> > At the end src/Makefile.am is updated to sort util files
> > alphabetically.
> >
> > Left as further work - make sure all functions in these
> > files also have a 'vir' prefix. eg dnsmasq, ebtables,
> > iptables, usb and pci files are violators in this regard.
> >
> > Also left, much of virutil.c should move into virfile.c
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > [1] Not a theoretical problem - we already hit a clsah
> > on 'usb.h' before forcing us to use 'hostusb.h'
> > and 'memory.h' clashes with a system header but we
> > never noticed so far.
> >
> > --
> > libvir-list mailing list
> > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
> >
>
> I've tried, but failed to apply patch 04/28; On the top of which commit
> should I apply this? I've tried the current HEAD (c17b16d1be8).
It was on top of
77d3a8097480e388f1ce3129fe530f235b05f93b
which is 1 commit newer than what you have
> Moreover, if you plan to resend, consider formatting patch with '-M'
> which catches the renaming and reduces the size of patches.
Yeah, my .gitconfig was missing the rename detection config option on
this host
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list