Re: [PATCH 00/28] Rename files in src/util to have a 'vir' prefix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17.12.2012 15:57, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Currently the files in src/util are 50/50 split between those
> having a 'vir' prefix and those which don't. Finish the job
> by remaining all remaining files to have a 'vir' prefix too,
> guaranteeing that they can't clash with system headers[1].
> 
> The only case which was not a plain rename, was merging
> processinfo.{c,h} into the virprocess.{c,h} since the
> functionality logically belongs together.
> 
> At the end src/Makefile.am is updated to sort util files
> alphabetically.
> 
> Left as further work - make sure all functions in these
> files also have a 'vir' prefix. eg dnsmasq, ebtables,
> iptables, usb and pci files are violators in this regard.
> 
> Also left, much of virutil.c should move into virfile.c
> 
> Daniel
> 
> [1] Not a theoretical problem - we already hit a clsah
>     on 'usb.h' before forcing us to use 'hostusb.h'
>     and 'memory.h' clashes with a system header but we
>     never noticed so far.
> 
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
> 

I've tried, but failed to apply patch 04/28; On the top of which commit
should I apply this? I've tried the current HEAD (c17b16d1be8).

Moreover, if you plan to resend, consider formatting patch with '-M'
which catches the renaming and reduces the size of patches.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]