On 12/03/2012 01:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> This resolves: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881480 >> >> These three functions: >> >> virDomainNetGetActualBridgeName >> virDomainNetGetActualDirectDev >> virDomainNetGetActualDirectMode >> >> return attributes that are in a union whose contents are interpreted >> differently depending on the actual->type and so they should only >> return non-0 when actual->type is 'bridge' (in the first case) or >> 'direct' (in the other two cases, but I had neglected to do that, >> (The other two functions weren't causing any behavioral problems in >> virDomainChangeNet(), but their problem and fix was identical, so I >> included them in this same patch). >> >> were supposed to only return non-0 values when > Spurious line in the commit message. > Oops. Forgot to delete that. I removed it before I pushed. Thanks! -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list