On 11/23/2012 09:20 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:32:38AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote: >> On 11/22/12 11:03, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> >>> I'll rework it to make it "as URI as possible" then. Just one question, >>> though (for anyone, I guess); why do we append port as a parameter for >>> spice scheme? >>> >>> Martin >>> >> >> I think it's because of what spicy supported initially (since v0.1.0): >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=f0693b9f949ba >> >> spice://<host>:<port> is supported since v0.8 >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=b4c72ece9ca3b >> >> and spice://<host>:<port>/ (with the trailing slash) since v0.12 >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=50add15ef69cd > > Another thing to keep in mind is that you can have both a port and a secure > port (over which data will transit through SSL). > > Christophe > I'm keeping that in the parameter as there will be both port and tlsPort available in this case. I also modified it so we have a vnc version and spice version of the output, which can be seen in v2 (rewrite cmdDomDisplay). Martin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list