[PATCH 1/6] Fix virDiskNameToIndex to actually ignore partition numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>

The docs for virDiskNameToIndex claim it ignores partition
numbers. In actual fact though, a code ordering buy means
that a partition number will cause the code to accidentally
multiply the result by 26.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 src/util/util.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/util/util.c b/src/util/util.c
index 75b18c1..2fd0f2c 100644
--- a/src/util/util.c
+++ b/src/util/util.c
@@ -2193,11 +2193,10 @@ int virDiskNameToIndex(const char *name) {
         return -1;
 
     for (i = 0; *ptr; i++) {
-        idx = (idx + (i < 1 ? 0 : 1)) * 26;
-
         if (!c_islower(*ptr))
             break;
 
+        idx = (idx + (i < 1 ? 0 : 1)) * 26;
         idx += *ptr - 'a';
         ptr++;
     }
-- 
1.7.11.2

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]