Hi, Shawn, On 2012年11月16日 21:24, Shawn Furrow wrote:
Osier, Thanks for including me in the review of this patch. I can tell right away that your implementation is better. It's more modular and well documented. When I submitted my patch about a month ago, it was basically just me submitting the changes that I made to get ivshmem working for my lab. We were on a tight deadline and so a lot of the code is rushed and poorly pieced together. However, I am glad that my submission has helped at least get the ball rolling on memory device support for Libvirt as it is very much needed.
So do you see if the implementation satisfies your needs? I.e. Does it work well in your lab? Regards, Osier -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list