On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 02:00:23PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 10/13/2012 05:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 10/13/2012 09:03 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: > >> On 10/13/2012 11:01 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: > >>> We add a helper python script build-aux/make-authors.py The .mailmap > >>> is expanded to give output as close to the original AUTHORS file as > >>> possible. Drop the syntax-check that validated AUTHORS is up to date. > >>> > >>> AUTHORS.in tracks the maintainers, as well as some folks who were > >>> previously in AUTHORS but don't have a git commit with proper > >>> attribution. > >> > >> Here's the AUTHORS diff it generates. I tried to make sure no one was dropped, > >> but it could use another look > > > > I ran sort on this diff, in en_US.UTF-8, and noticed that: > > > > 'Aron Griffis' was added, but with the same email as 'Amy Griffis' > > (missing a .mailmap entry for preferred name). > > > > 'redshift' was added, but with the same email as 'Marco Bozzolan' > > (another missing .mailmap entry) > > > > A couple of names were spelled differently: you fixed Darryl L. Pierce, > > and changed to Gerd v. Egidy. > > > > The duplicate entry 'Serge Hallyn' was consolidated by the 'Serge E. > > Hallyn' entry. > > > > For the last three, I standardized on the name that was already in AUTHORS. > I'll fix the first 2. > > But as to Rich's comment, anyone object to sorting AUTHORS alphabetically? > Will simplify this process at least, and if anyone cares about who committed > when they can check git log. Sorting is fine, as long as we keep the list of the primary maintainers separate & sorted independently of the list of patch contributors. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list