On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/13/2012 05:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 10/13/2012 09:03 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: >>> On 10/13/2012 11:01 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: >>>> We add a helper python script build-aux/make-authors.py The .mailmap >>>> is expanded to give output as close to the original AUTHORS file as >>>> possible. Drop the syntax-check that validated AUTHORS is up to date. >>>> >>>> AUTHORS.in tracks the maintainers, as well as some folks who were >>>> previously in AUTHORS but don't have a git commit with proper >>>> attribution. >>> >>> Here's the AUTHORS diff it generates. I tried to make sure no one was dropped, >>> but it could use another look >> >> I ran sort on this diff, in en_US.UTF-8, and noticed that: >> >> 'Aron Griffis' was added, but with the same email as 'Amy Griffis' >> (missing a .mailmap entry for preferred name). >> >> 'redshift' was added, but with the same email as 'Marco Bozzolan' >> (another missing .mailmap entry) >> >> A couple of names were spelled differently: you fixed Darryl L. Pierce, >> and changed to Gerd v. Egidy. >> >> The duplicate entry 'Serge Hallyn' was consolidated by the 'Serge E. >> Hallyn' entry. >> > > For the last three, I standardized on the name that was already in AUTHORS. > I'll fix the first 2. > > But as to Rich's comment, anyone object to sorting AUTHORS alphabetically? > Will simplify this process at least, and if anyone cares about who committed > when they can check git log. > > - Cole Seems reasonable. The who is more important than the when anyway. -- Doug Goldstein -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list