Re: [PATCH] Check for private symbols presence as well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/05/2012 07:05 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Currently, we are checking if libvirt.so contains public symbols.
> However, sometimes we rename an internal symbol and forget to
> change libvirt_private.syms accordingly. Hence, it's safer to check
> for internal symbols as well.
> ---
>  src/Makefile.am      |    7 ++++++-
>  src/check-symfile.pl |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

ACK.  I confirmed that this catches the problem fixed by your commit
fcd6477.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]