On 09/25/2012 06:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:49:00PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> On 25.09.2012 10:58, Dmitry Fleytman wrote: >>> This patch fixes incorrect help screen parsing for QEMU 1.0.1 package >>> Version line changed from >>> QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard >>> To >>> QEMU emulator version 1.0,1 (qemu-kvm-1.0.1), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard >> >> This seems like a bug to me. If it is a micro version number, why is it >> delimited with comma instead of dot? If it is not a micro version >> number, can we threat it like it is? > > I agree, it smells very much like a QEMU/distro bug to me. It is an upstream bug: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-02/msg02527.html Distros should probably be backporting that particular patch, but there's still the question of whether we should deal with it in libvirt because it is upstream. -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list