On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 17:48:49 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 05:29 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> PM{Suspend,Wakeup} event callbacks were designed with a reason parameter
> >> which could be used in the future. However, we do not transfer the
> >> reason over RPC and thus we can never use it in the future. Make it
> >> explicit in the docs.
> >> ---
> >> include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in | 6 ++----
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Why can't we create a new RPC that _does_ pass reason, then when the
> event fires, we call the appropriate RPC based on the capabilities of
> the receiving end? That is, I don't think we are locked into never
> being able to pass a useful reason.
Good I split this from the other patches, I can just easily drop it while
pushing the rest :-)
Jirka
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list