On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:47:03AM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:26:08PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> [...]
[...]
> So that will work as long as we don't add namespace to the XML
> Another problem is making sure we have the addressing complete,
> for example suppose we have
> <
Oops i didn't finish that argument
supose we have somewhere
<foo>
...
</foo>
<foo>
...
</foo>
first are the element always sorted in a coherent fashion internally
so that if we do //foo[2] we know which one is pointed at, or if
we can guarantee order can we guarantee that for all constructs there
is an identifier like an attribute allowing unique selection (like
availability of an ip address)
My concern is an API with hole, where there is no way to guarantee
reaching the element we want to modify, and risking touching something
else. Say for example 2 interface with DHCP and no IP...
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list