On 08/08/2012 05:13 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:52:41 -0400
Corey Bryant <coreyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/08/2012 04:48 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:07:02 -0400
Corey Bryant <coreyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/07/2012 06:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/07/2012 11:07 AM, Corey Bryant wrote:
+#
+# Since: 1.2.0
We're not very consistent on '1.2' vs. '1.2.0' in since listings, but
that's probably worth a global cleanup closer to hard freeze.
I'll make a note of it. Or does Luiz usually do a cleanup?
No idea.
Luiz, were you planning to take a pass at cleaning up the "since"
release? If not let me know and I can submit a patch. Just let me know
which to use, '1.2' or '1.2.0'.
I'd appreciate it if you submit a patch. I guess we should use 1.2.0.
Sure I'll do that.
Btw, should I be using error_set(errp, ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR, "...")
and have a dependency on your patch series? Or should I stick with the
old error messages?
That would preferable, yes. Specially if you're adding new errors.
But I'm not exactly sure when my series will be merged, this depends on
what review will bring.
Are you planning on getting in QEMU 1.2?
--
Regards,
Corey
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list