Re: [PATCH] Added timestamps to storage volumes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/19/2012 01:13 AM, Hendrik Schwartke wrote:
> I reconsidered the way timestamps are represented. I think that an event
> at 100.91 happened before 100.200 is misleading.

Yep, definite bug - you have to zero-pad the subsecond resolution, and
also consider whether to strip trailing zeros.

> So I changed that.
> Furthermore I would appreciate if the timestamps are available in
> 0.10.0, so I splitted the patch. The first patch doesn't use stat-time
> and the second patches the first and does use stat-time.

Not necessary to do two implementations.  stat-time has now been
relicensed in gnulib, so all we are waiting on now is for updated
automake to hit Fedora 17 (it has already hit rawhide):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838660

Given the security bug in current automake, I will actively protest
releasing the next version of libvirt until fixed automake is available.

Don't worry - I plan to include this feature in the next libvirt build;
just a few more days of waiting.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]