Re: [PATCH] Added timestamps to storage volumes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11.07.2012 15:10, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/11/2012 07:09 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/11/2012 01:12 AM, Hendrik Schwartke wrote:

+    atime->tv_sec = sb.st_atime;
+    mtime->tv_sec = sb.st_mtime;
+    catime->tv_sec = sb.st_ctime;
+#if _BSD_SOURCE || _SVID_SOURCE
+    atime->tv_nsec = sb.st_atim.tv_nsec;
Yuck.  I've nearly got consensus to use the gnulib stat-time module, in
which case this would instead be the much simpler:
Ok, that sounds good. But what exactly does 'nearly' mean?
It means 3 of the 4 copyright holders have agreed, with less than
24-hour turnaround time; the 4th will likely respond sometime this week:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-07/msg00141.html

Correction - there is only one copyright holder - the FSF.  But 3 of the
4 original contributors have agreed to a relicense, and if all original
contributors agree, then we don't have to bother the FSF with a much
more formal and lengthy process of convincing the FSF to relicense.

Oh, cool. I didn't thought that this could be done in such a short term.
So I will update my patch using stat-time this week so that it is ready if the license has changed.
(I will also add the birth time.)

Thanks
Hendrik

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]