Re: [PATCH 3/6] virsh: make tree listing more flexible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/2012 07:43 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 07:13 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> On 06/09/12 06:34, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Requiring the user to pass in parallel arrays of names and parents
>>> is annoying; it means that you can't qsort one of the arrays without
>>> invalidating the ordering of the other.  By refactoring this function
>>> to use callbacks, we isolate the layout to be independent of the
>>> printing, and a future patch can exploit that to improve layout.
>>>

>>> +static const char *
>>> +vshTreeArrayLookup(int devid, bool parent, void *opaque)

>>
>> This is used just for listing node devices IIUC. Wouln't it be better to
>> explicitly name the helper and struct that it's meant for node devices?
>> vshNodeDeviceTree ... ?
> 
> In _this_ patch, it's used by both node devices and snapshots.  Later,
> in patch 6/6, I switch snapshots over to using a different callback.
> Maybe I should rename this function as part of that later split into two
> different callbacks, but for this patch, since it really is used twice,
> I think it makes sense as-is.
> 
>>
>> ACK. The name doesn't matter that much, making the tree printer more
>> universal does.

I've pushed this now, but will remain open to the idea of reworking 6/6
to adjust naming.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]