On 06/11/2012 07:13 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 06/09/12 06:34, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Requiring the user to pass in parallel arrays of names and parents
>> is annoying; it means that you can't qsort one of the arrays without
>> invalidating the ordering of the other. By refactoring this function
>> to use callbacks, we isolate the layout to be independent of the
>> printing, and a future patch can exploit that to improve layout.
>>
>> * tools/virsh.c (vshTreePrintInternal): Use callbacks rather than
>> requiring a char** array.
>> (vshTreeArrayLookup): New helper function.
>> (vshTreePrint, cmdNodeListDevices, cmdSnapshotList): Update callers.
>> +static const char *
>> +vshTreeArrayLookup(int devid, bool parent, void *opaque)
>> +{
>> + struct vshTreeArray *arrays = opaque;
>> + if (parent)
>> + return arrays->parents[devid];
>> + return arrays->names[devid];
>> +}
>> +
>
> This is used just for listing node devices IIUC. Wouln't it be better to
> explicitly name the helper and struct that it's meant for node devices?
> vshNodeDeviceTree ... ?
In _this_ patch, it's used by both node devices and snapshots. Later,
in patch 6/6, I switch snapshots over to using a different callback.
Maybe I should rename this function as part of that later split into two
different callbacks, but for this patch, since it really is used twice,
I think it makes sense as-is.
>
> ACK. The name doesn't matter that much, making the tree printer more
> universal does.
>
> Peter
>
>
--
Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list