On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:31:12PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 12:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >From: "Daniel P. Berrange"<berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >When sVirt is integrated with the LXC driver, it will be neccessary
> >to invoke the security driver APIs using only a virDomainDefPtr
> >since the lxc_container.c code has no virDomainObjPtr available.
> >Aside from two functions which want obj->pid, every bit of the
> >security driver code only touches obj->def. So we don't need to
> >pass a virDomainObjPtr into the security drivers, a virDomainDefPtr
> >is sufficient. Two functions also gain a 'pid_t pid' argument.
> >
> > virSecurityStackSetImageFDLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr,
> >- virDomainObjPtr vm,
> >+ virDomainDefPtr vm,
> > int fd)
> > {
> > virSecurityStackDataPtr priv = virSecurityManagerGetPrivateData(mgr);
> straight-forward refactoring and gcc was also happy -> ACK
Opps, forgot to push this one originally. Pushed now, after trivial
rebase.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list