On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:42:39AM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:21:02 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 01/06/2012 08:04 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > > --- > > > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 3 ++- > > > src/conf/domain_conf.h | 1 + > > > src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 3 +++ > > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > Aargh - 'git grep taint docs/*.in' turned up nothing, so we don't have > > any documentation of tainting. That would be a nice thing to add before > > this patch, along with mentioning each category of taint (including this > > new category). > > Good idea. Unfortunately, I couldn't find a good place for such documentation > since tainting is not very visible to users. It results in a warning message > want to document. Any ideas where would be the best place to document > tainting? And could that be actually done as a follow up patch instead? :-) I can't think of any existing page that is really relevant. Perhaps time to start a new one ? Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list