On 12/07/2011 11:58 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
Hi,
this is the fifth version of my SRV record for DNSMasq patch rebased
for the current codebase to the bridge driver and libvirt XML file to
include support for the SRV records in the DNS. The syntax is based on
DNSMasq man page and tests for both xml2xml and xml2argv were added as
well. There are some things written a better way in comparison with
version 4, mainly there's no hack in tests/networkxml2argvtest.c and
also the xPath context is changed to use a simpler query using the
virXPathInt() function relative to the current node.
Also, the patch is also fixing the networkxml2argv test to pass both
checks, i.e. both unit tests and also syntax check.
Please review,
Michal
Signed-off-by: Michal Novotny<minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/src/conf/network_conf.h b/src/conf/network_conf.h
index 1be20f8..5ef4878 100644
--- a/src/conf/network_conf.h
+++ b/src/conf/network_conf.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
#ifndef __NETWORK_CONF_H__
# define __NETWORK_CONF_H__
+#define DNS_RECORD_LENGTH_SRV (512 - 30) /* Limit minus overhead as mentioned in RFC-2782 */
This line needs to be indented by one space to pass syntax check.
+
# include<libxml/parser.h>
# include<libxml/tree.h>
# include<libxml/xpath.h>
@@ -69,6 +71,18 @@ struct _virNetworkDNSTxtRecordsDef {
char *value;
};
+typedef struct _virNetworkDNSSrvRecordsDef virNetworkDNSSrvRecordsDef;
+typedef virNetworkDNSSrvRecordsDef *virNetworkDNSSrvRecordsDefPtr;
+struct _virNetworkDNSSrvRecordsDef {
+ char *domain;
+ char *service;
+ char *protocol;
+ char *target;
+ int port;
+ int priority;
+ int weight;
+};
+
This patch hasn't been pushed yet, while it has been ACKed a while ago.
I don't know if it's the right time to push it now. What do you think
Daniel?
Peter
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list