On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 04:10:34PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:30:35PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On 12/02/2011 01:42 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > >On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:11:24PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > > >>But that means we really are committing to an rc2. > > > > > > Definitely. For example there is apparently a problem with commit > > >fa9595003d043df9f2efe95521c00898cef27106 that we ough to fix quickly too > > >to allow further testing :-) > > > > > >Daniel > > > > > The problem was caused by two threads that both were thinking they > > are having the buck and entering poll() which caused some clients to > > hang. It was possible due to a race condition and therefore was not > > 100% reproducible. It should be fixed now with: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-December/msg00116.html > > Indeed, the current git head works fine again for me, thanks a lot > for chasing this :-) > > So I made an second release candidate available at: > > ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/libvirt-0.9.8-rc2.tar.gz > > along with rpms, I also tagged git with it. > Hopefully the builds on BSD and Windows should be fixed, it would > be good if it could be tested on OsX and since there was a build done > last month on Android, I wonder if this could be done again [1]. The rc2 build now also looks good on Debian's kFreeBSD buildds thanks to the fixes that went in since rc1: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libvirt&suite=experimental Cheers, -- Guido -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list