On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:30:35PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On 12/02/2011 01:42 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:11:24PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > >>But that means we really are committing to an rc2. > > > > Definitely. For example there is apparently a problem with commit > >fa9595003d043df9f2efe95521c00898cef27106 that we ough to fix quickly too > >to allow further testing :-) > > > >Daniel > > > The problem was caused by two threads that both were thinking they > are having the buck and entering poll() which caused some clients to > hang. It was possible due to a race condition and therefore was not > 100% reproducible. It should be fixed now with: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-December/msg00116.html Indeed, the current git head works fine again for me, thanks a lot for chasing this :-) So I made an second release candidate available at: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/libvirt-0.9.8-rc2.tar.gz along with rpms, I also tagged git with it. Hopefully the builds on BSD and Windows should be fixed, it would be good if it could be tested on OsX and since there was a build done last month on Android, I wonder if this could be done again [1]. thanks everybody ! Daniel [1] maybe we should setup some cross compilation testing like for cygwin... -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list