On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:24:55AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/09/2011 08:37 AM, Guido Günther wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:54:36AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 10:15:37PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > >>>Hi Eric, > >>> > >>>On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:53:39AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > >>>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728772 > >>>>points out that libvirt commit 1c93fbbb pulled in a gnulib > >>>>regression that broke large file support. > >>> > >>>I had a quick look and rerunning this pulls in quite some auto* changes. > >>>Any pointers how a minimal patch against 0.9.4 should look like that > >>>distributors could apply? > >> > >>Yes, there is a patch attached to that BZ ticket above that is > >>the minimal workaround distros should apply. > >Works great. Thanks, > > That still implies re-running the autotools to convert configure.ac > changes over to configure. If you want an absolute minimum patch > that does not require the autotools during your distro build, and > you are just building for Linux, then it should be sufficient to > change your build script to use: > > ./configure CPPFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 We also have kFreeBSD and Hurd in the mix so I opted for rerunning configure. Thanks, -- Guido -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list