Hi Eric, On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:53:39AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728772 > points out that libvirt commit 1c93fbbb pulled in a gnulib > regression that broke large file support. I had a quick look and rerunning this pulls in quite some auto* changes. Any pointers how a minimal patch against 0.9.4 should look like that distributors could apply? Cheers, -- Guido > > * .gnulib: Update to latest, for largefile fix. > --- > > Pushing under the trivial rule. > > .gnulib | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/.gnulib b/.gnulib > index 7f494c7..4470580 160000 > --- a/.gnulib > +++ b/.gnulib > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -Subproject commit 7f494c7d725db4a7f3abdef09d4070725487da67 > +Subproject commit 4470580881a7b821b52fb5635102ef3e27aa5af4 > -- > 1.7.4.4 > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list