Re: [PATCH] interface: Check for interface (in-)activity on some operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.07.2011 16:45, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/15/2011 08:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On the other hand, if we don't support transient interfaces, then the
above analysis which works for domains would have to be adjusted for
interfaces, so you may have something to patch after all.

Well, although we have function interfaceCreate, it is actually (from
semantic POV) interfaceStart, because it just start inactive but defined
interface. So we do not support transient interfaces. Therefore
transitions for interfaces are slightly different from transitions for
domains. That's why I think we do need this patch.

Let's nail down the transitions that we plan to support, then, just as I
did earlier for domains.

It would be even cooler to have a life cycle diagram with the API used
to transition between states documented somewhere.  I seem to recall
seeing one for domains once, but couldn't find it in 5 minutes of
searching right now.

You mean
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VM_lifecycle#States_that_a_guest_domain_can_be_in
?

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]