Re: [PATCH] interface: Check for interface (in-)activity on some operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/15/2011 08:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On the other hand, if we don't support transient interfaces, then the
>> above analysis which works for domains would have to be adjusted for
>> interfaces, so you may have something to patch after all.
>>
> Well, although we have function interfaceCreate, it is actually (from
> semantic POV) interfaceStart, because it just start inactive but defined
> interface. So we do not support transient interfaces. Therefore
> transitions for interfaces are slightly different from transitions for
> domains. That's why I think we do need this patch.

Let's nail down the transitions that we plan to support, then, just as I
did earlier for domains.

It would be even cooler to have a life cycle diagram with the API used
to transition between states documented somewhere.  I seem to recall
seeing one for domains once, but couldn't find it in 5 minutes of
searching right now.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]