On 07/05/2011 05:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 03:45:52AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
domain.rng, network.rng, and interface.rng already use a few of the
same types (or in some cases *should* but don't), and an upcoming code
change will have them sharing even more. To prepare for that, this
patch takes those common data type definitions and moves them into
basictypes.rng.
This may break some rule about the need to RNG files to be autonomous
or something, but I saw that storageencryption.rng is used in this
way, so I figured it must not be completely against the law...
---
docs/schemas/Makefile.am | 1 +
docs/schemas/basictypes.rng | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
docs/schemas/domain.rng | 86 +---------------------------
docs/schemas/interface.rng | 71 ++++-------------------
docs/schemas/network.rng | 79 +++++++-------------------
libvirt.spec.in | 1 +
6 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 200 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 docs/schemas/basictypes.rng
Oh, you need to change mingw32-libvirt.spec.in too
Okay, I made that change and pushed the result. (also added a similar
mingw32-libvirt.spec.in change to patch 06/10 (fornetworkcommon.rng).
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list