On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 03:45:52AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > domain.rng, network.rng, and interface.rng already use a few of the > same types (or in some cases *should* but don't), and an upcoming code > change will have them sharing even more. To prepare for that, this > patch takes those common data type definitions and moves them into > basictypes.rng. > > This may break some rule about the need to RNG files to be autonomous > or something, but I saw that storageencryption.rng is used in this > way, so I figured it must not be completely against the law... > --- > docs/schemas/Makefile.am | 1 + > docs/schemas/basictypes.rng | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > docs/schemas/domain.rng | 86 +--------------------------- > docs/schemas/interface.rng | 71 ++++------------------- > docs/schemas/network.rng | 79 +++++++------------------- > libvirt.spec.in | 1 + > 6 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 200 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 docs/schemas/basictypes.rng Oh, you need to change mingw32-libvirt.spec.in too Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list