Re: [PATCH 4/4] Move virRun, virExec*, virFork to util/command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/01/2011 04:02 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 03:52 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 05/17/2011 09:06 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> Seems reasonable to have all command wrappers in the same place
>>>
>>> v2:
>>>     Dont move SetInherit
>>>
>>> v3:
>>>     Comment spelling fix
>>>     Adjust WARN0 comment
>>>     Remove spurious #include movement
>>>     Don't include sys/types.h
>>>     Combine virExec enums
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> @@ -42,9 +48,13 @@
>>>      virReportErrorHelper(VIR_FROM_NONE, code, __FILE__,                 \
>>>                           __FUNCTION__, __LINE__, __VA_ARGS__)
>>
>> Looks like you addressed all my comments; and sorry for the delay on
>> this last round of reviews.
>>
>> ACK.
>>
>> Overall, this is a rather large change to be pushing after feature
>> freeze; I'm 50-50 on whether we should delay this until after the
>> release, since it is missing test exposure by not being part of RC1.
>> Does anyone else have an opinion on whether this is safe enough to push now?
>>
> 
> Not really worth potentially rocking the boat over, I say we just wait
> till after the release.
> 

I've pushed this series now.

Thanks,
Cole

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]