Re: [PATCH 4/4] Move virRun, virExec*, virFork to util/command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/01/2011 03:52 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 09:06 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> Seems reasonable to have all command wrappers in the same place
>>
>> v2:
>>     Dont move SetInherit
>>
>> v3:
>>     Comment spelling fix
>>     Adjust WARN0 comment
>>     Remove spurious #include movement
>>     Don't include sys/types.h
>>     Combine virExec enums
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> @@ -42,9 +48,13 @@
>>      virReportErrorHelper(VIR_FROM_NONE, code, __FILE__,                 \
>>                           __FUNCTION__, __LINE__, __VA_ARGS__)
> 
> Looks like you addressed all my comments; and sorry for the delay on
> this last round of reviews.
> 
> ACK.
> 
> Overall, this is a rather large change to be pushing after feature
> freeze; I'm 50-50 on whether we should delay this until after the
> release, since it is missing test exposure by not being part of RC1.
> Does anyone else have an opinion on whether this is safe enough to push now?
> 

Not really worth potentially rocking the boat over, I say we just wait
till after the release.

Thanks,
Cole

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]