On 04/14/2011 12:52 AM, Laine Stump wrote: >> Should we also minimize the truncation by adding just "-n" instead of >> "-nic", so that there are fewer user strings being butchered? Or would >> that cause problems for existing users that already have bridge-nic and >> would now also have bridge-n? > > So, is this minor artifact worth getting the extra two characters? I'll > let the patch sit until midday, and if someone comes out in support of > changing it, I'll reduce the suffix to "-n" and push, otherwise I'll > push as-is. I can live with the patch as-is, if no one else speaks for the two extra characters. -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list