On 03/18/2011 11:36 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> The xen RPM in Fedora isn't new enough to support libxl builds >> yet. Disable it until Fedora 16 >> >> Q: What actually is the min required Xen ? Is xen 4.0.1 >> in fact sufficient ? If so I'll change this to s/16/15/ >> > > Xen 4.0.x contains some "tech preview" libxenlight bits, but it is buggy > and missing quite a bit of functionality. Xen 4.1.0 is the first release > with a usable libxenlight IMO. Also, the API changed quite a bit between > Xen 4.0 and 4.1 and I have not attempted to make the libxl driver work > with the preview libxenlight. Can we enhance the configure test (when there is no explicit --with-libxl) to reject the 4.0.x library, by requiring linking with a function that only exists in 4.1? -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list