Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The xen RPM in Fedora isn't new enough to support libxl builds > yet. Disable it until Fedora 16 > > Q: What actually is the min required Xen ? Is xen 4.0.1 > in fact sufficient ? If so I'll change this to s/16/15/ > Xen 4.0.x contains some "tech preview" libxenlight bits, but it is buggy and missing quite a bit of functionality. Xen 4.1.0 is the first release with a usable libxenlight IMO. Also, the API changed quite a bit between Xen 4.0 and 4.1 and I have not attempted to make the libxl driver work with the preview libxenlight. Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list