On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:07:45PM +0200, arnaud.champion@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> ?Okay, I'll make the change... Currently at naming level, my problem is
> around Error class. Do you have a suggestion ?
What's wrong with following the example I gave, eg
namespace Libvirt [
public class Error {
...
> >
> >IMHO
> >
> >namespace LibvirtBindings
> >{
> > public class virDomain
> > {
> > ....
> >
> >Is somewhat redundant and better named
> >
> >namespace Libvirt
> >{
> > public class Domain
> > {
> > ....
> >
> >
> >The 'vir' prefix on C library APIs/structs is just a hack because C
> >does not have any concept of namespaces. It shouldn't be copied into
> >languages which do have proper namespace support
> >
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list