?Okay, I'll make the change... Currently at naming level, my problem is
around Error class. Do you have a suggestion ?
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:01 PM
To: <arnaud.champion@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] C#Bindings patch, rename classes
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:44:56PM +0200, arnaud.champion@xxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
?Hi,
here is a new patch. It propose to separate types of function by classes.
For example :
all virConnect[*] (virConnectOpen, virConnectNumOfDomains, etc...)
functions are in the virConnect class.
all virDomain[*] (virDomainCreate, virDomainDestroy, etc...) function are
in the virDomain class.
so we have these classes now :
virConnect
virDomain
virEvent
virInterface
virLibrary
virNetwork
virNode
virSecret
virStoragePool
virStorageVol
virStream
IMHO
namespace LibvirtBindings
{
public class virDomain
{
....
Is somewhat redundant and better named
namespace Libvirt
{
public class Domain
{
....
The 'vir' prefix on C library APIs/structs is just a hack because C
does not have any concept of namespaces. It shouldn't be copied into
languages which do have proper namespace support
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B
9505 :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list