On 10/16/2010 03:01 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi all, Working on the "Foundation Concepts" for virtual switches at the moment. Does anyone have time/inclination to check over the concept graphics thus far, for technical accuracy?
I think it would more clearly convey what was going on if there was a 3rd "cable" coming out of the switch in all the diagrams that went back to the host, and was labeled with the bridge's name and IP address (192.168.122.1 by default).
I might have some other tweaks for the diagrams, but I'm it's difficult to articulate in words, and I'm not sure yet if it would be better than what you have anyway ;-)
Especially the "Routing mode" and "Non-routing" mode ones, as I'm not sure if that's the right terminology for them:
I would use what's used in the XML documentation - "routed" and "isolated".
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VirtualNetworking#Routing_mode http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VirtualNetworking#Non-routing_mode General feedback, thoughts, and suggestions are welcome too of course. :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list