On 10/7/2010 5:13 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 10:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04:11AM +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
>>> This patch introduces new attribute to filesystem element
>>> to support customizable security_model for mount type.
>>> Valid security_model are: passthrough, mapped and none.
>>>
>>> Usage:
>>> <filesystem type='mount' security_model='passthrough'>
>>
>> I'd like to think of a different name for this, because
>> 'security_model' is already used in libvirt in the context
>> of sVirt and I think it'd be better to avoid the same
>> terminology. I've not got any ideas just yet, but I'll
>> think of some....
>
> "mount_security"
> "mount_security_type"
> "mount_security_mode" ("mode" sounds too similar to "model" tho maybe)
Actually all three sound good.. mount_security is good enough if no objections.
- JV
>
> ?
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list