On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:54:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 06/21/2010 03:47 PM, Justin Clift wrote: > > > This patch adds a new --details option to the virsh pool-list > > > command, making its output more useful to people who use virsh > > > for significant lengths of time. > > > > > > Addresses BZ # 605543 > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605543 > > > > > > + /* Determine the total number of pools to list */ > > > + numAllPools = numActivePools + numInactivePools; > > > + if (!numAllPools) { > > > + /* No pools to list, so cleanup and return */ > > > + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", _("No matching pools to display")); > > > + return TRUE; > > > + } > > > > This is a change in behavior, even when the user didn't specify > > --details. Might it cause any backward compatibility issues in > > scripting, or are we okay with the change? > > Correct, we shouldn't change this behaviour - it'll break apps parsing > the output FWIW Rich Jones complains that the output as it stands is nigh on unparseable anyway. Perhaps we should consider that a bug, and fix it... --Hugh -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list