On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/21/2010 03:47 PM, Justin Clift wrote: > > This patch adds a new --details option to the virsh pool-list > > command, making its output more useful to people who use virsh > > for significant lengths of time. > > > > Addresses BZ # 605543 > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605543 > > > > + /* Determine the total number of pools to list */ > > + numAllPools = numActivePools + numInactivePools; > > + if (!numAllPools) { > > + /* No pools to list, so cleanup and return */ > > + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", _("No matching pools to display")); > > + return TRUE; > > + } > > This is a change in behavior, even when the user didn't specify > --details. Might it cause any backward compatibility issues in > scripting, or are we okay with the change? Correct, we shouldn't change this behaviour - it'll break apps parsing the output Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list