Re: [PATCH 1/1] Improve nodedev parent/child relationships

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:39:23AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:07:54PM -0400, David Allan wrote:
> > * If a nodedev has a parent that we don't want to display, we should
> >   continue walking up the udev device tree to see if any of its
> >   earlier ancestors are devices that we display.  It makes the tree
> >   much nicer looking than having a whole lot of devices hanging off
> >   the root node.
> 
> ACK this fixes the scsi host vs target relationship in the trees on
> my machine

Thanks, pushed.

Dave

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]