Re: [PATCH 1/1] Improve nodedev parent/child relationships

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:07:54PM -0400, David Allan wrote:
> * If a nodedev has a parent that we don't want to display, we should
>   continue walking up the udev device tree to see if any of its
>   earlier ancestors are devices that we display.  It makes the tree
>   much nicer looking than having a whole lot of devices hanging off
>   the root node.

ACK this fixes the scsi host vs target relationship in the trees on
my machine

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org        -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]