Re: [PATCH v1 15/20] node_device_udev: Pass the driver state as parameter in preparation for the next commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/23/24 3:41 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:06 AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:46:14AM +0200, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:10 AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:23 PM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/19/24 9:49 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
It's better practice for all functions called by the threads to
pass the driver

[…snip…]


Hmm, is the downside of doing a full codebase reformat greater than
always doing the code formatting manually? Probably it is, otherwise it
would have already be done :)

If we would have such a big commit we could list it in a
`.git-blame-ignore-revs` file so it will ignored by git blames.

Yes, that's great for git blame. The bigger problem though is that
a bulk reformat will immediately kill the ability of distro
maintainers to cleanly cherry-pick patches across the big reformat
commit. Cherry-picking the reformat likely won't be clean either,
so they'll be faced with many patches needing manual editting.

Yes, but isn't that already the case most of the time? But since I do
not backport libvirt fixes, I cannot answer this for sure :)

As a downstream package maintainer, I always shake my fist at these types of reformat changes when they break clean cherry-picks. But I also understand progress, modernization, etc can't be hamstrung by downstream convenience :-).

Regards,
Jim


Anyhow, we shouldn't misuse this mail thread for the side discussion :)
Is it worth starting a separate thread for it or is the answer a clear
NACK?


The tricky question is whether it is none the less worthwhile doing
it. The distro maintainer pain will be very real, but also somewhat
timelimited, as the need to backport fixes to a given release
as it ages.

If the people doing the backporting are more or less libvirt developers,
it might be a good trade for them in the long run.


With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux