Re: [PATCH v1 15/20] node_device_udev: Pass the driver state as parameter in preparation for the next commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:23 PM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 4/19/24 9:49 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> >> It's better practice for all functions called by the threads to pass the driver
> >> via parameter and not global variables. Easier to test and cleaner.
> >>
> 
> […snip…]
> 
> >>   
> >>   
> >>   static int
> >> -udevProcessPCI(struct udev_device *device,
> >> +udevProcessPCI(virNodeDeviceDriverState *driver_state, struct udev_device *device,
> >>                  virNodeDeviceDef *def)
> >
> > While there are exceptions, the general coding style is to have a single 
> > argument per line for function definitions.
> 
> Okay. BTW, why is there no .clangformat configuration available for
> Libvirt? :/

There is no combination of clangformat settings that can match
libvirt code style. If we were startnig again from scratch we
would of course want to match a defined clangformat style,
but unless we're willing to bulk reformat the codebase we are
stuck with what we have.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux