Re: RFC: Drop micro part of our release versioning scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 08:43:00 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Does anyone feel strongly against dropping the "micro" part from
> libvirt(-python) versions? I think the original idea was to use this
> number for maintenance releases in -maint branches, but we stopped doing
> those a long time ago (v3.2.1 was the last and most likely even the only
> release with micro > 0 since the change in numbering libvirt releases).
> So the micro part looks quite useless, not to mention I am lazy to type
> the .0 suffix all the time :-)
> 
> And if we decide to drop it, what would be the right time? This 10.3
> release, the following 10.4 release or should we wait until 11.0?
> Personally I'd do it just now, but someone might be relying on the
> numbers and would prefer to know about such change in advance to prepare
> for it. So perhaps 10.4 or the most conservative 11.0 would be better
> options.

Since we've established that version numbers in libvirt don't mean
anything I'd suggest not "waiting for 11.0".

Said that I think we should give some notice period, perhaps 2 releases?
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux