Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] cpu_map: update script to handle versioned CPUs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 05:08:02PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 12/15/23 15:11, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> > Previously, the script only generated the parent CPU and any versions
> > that had a defined alias. The script now generates all CPU versions. Any
> > version that had a defined alias will continue to use that alias, but
> > those without aliases will use the generated name $BASECPUNAME-vN.
> > 
> > The reason for this change is two-fold. First, we need to add new models
> > that support new features (such as SEV-SNP). To deal with this, the
> > script now generates model definitions for all versions.
> > 
> > But we also need to ensure that our CPU definitions are migration-safe.
> > To deal with this issue we need to make sure we're always using the
> > canonical versioned names for CPUs.
> 
> Related to migration safety, do we need to be concerned with the expansion
> of 'host-model' CPU? E.g. is it possible 'host-model' expands to EPYC before
> introducing the new models, and EPYC-v4 afterwards? If so, what are the
> ramifications of that?

Yes, I see that happening on my laptop in domcapabilities:

Currently libvirt reports:

    <mode name='host-model' supported='yes'>
      <model fallback='forbid'>Snowridge</model>
      <vendor>Intel</vendor>
      <maxphysaddr mode='passthrough' limit='46'/>
      <feature policy='require' name='ss'/>
      <feature policy='require' name='vmx'/>
     ...snip...


and after this series it reports:

    <mode name='host-model' supported='yes'>
      <model fallback='forbid'>Snowridge-v4</model>
      <vendor>Intel</vendor>
      <maxphysaddr mode='passthrough' limit='46'/>
      <feature policy='require' name='ss'/>
      <feature policy='require' name='vmx'/>
     ...snip...


That's not wrong per-se, becasue Snowrigde-v4 has a smaller
delta against my host CPU.

The problem is that libvirt updates the *live* XML for the
guest with this expansion.  IIUC, if we now attempt to
live migrate to a compatible machine running older libvirt
the migrate will fail as old libvirt doesn't know the -v4
CPU.

I'm not sure how to address this ? 

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux