On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 05:36:03PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:42:10 -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > Any chance either of you could look at the other patch[1] as well? > > The connection to alpha is sort of tangential in that case, what's > > more important is that we're currently not using -fstack-protector > > on aarch64 even though we should. > > IMO there you should post a version which just enables > -fstack-protector everywhere, as in ... drop the alpha hack. That one is > starting to go beyond the 'trivial' change. That's not my preference, clearly, but I'm okay doing that. While this patch is strictly necessary to make libvirt build successfully on alpha, the alpha-related part of the other one only removes a number of annoying, but ultimately harmless warnings. One last chance for someone to ACK that patch as-is. If not, I'll cave in and post an updated, alpha-free version :) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
