On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:18:43PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:39:29PM +0100, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > On 1/26/24 11:21, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > Can you please take another look at this patch (as well as the other > > > one that contains alpha-specific changes) in light of the arguments > > > that I've provided above? Thanks. > > > > I don't want to override Dan, but to me this makes sense. Unless he > > disagrees, you have my: > > Go for it. > > I still maintain no one should waste a second of effort on an > architecture that was dead before libvirt even started as a > project, but won't block this. Thanks, I appreciate that! Any chance either of you could look at the other patch[1] as well? The connection to alpha is sort of tangential in that case, what's more important is that we're currently not using -fstack-protector on aarch64 even though we should. [1] https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/R5C57PJM3JPTXAK5Q25DS6J3CCEUTLVA/ -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
