On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:42:19AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 05:20:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > If we at least start the discussion, we can get feedback on whether the > > > > idea is likely to gain traction, or there are other things we have > > > > overlooked > > > > > > I can open an issue on the systemd side pointing to these patches, > > > but polishing things up to the level of a proper PR is off the table > > > right now because I simply can't allocate enough time for it. Would > > > you consider that good enough to move forward with the libvirt > > > changes? > > > > > > On the Fedora side, I wouldn't know what forum would be the most > > > appropriate to get the discussion started. Any pointers? > > > > Fedora devel list is probably the catch all place to raise it > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Done. > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/DLS73XUFYRXRFWHUQHE53ATAUDKHCMJK/ Summing up the discussion that happened in that thread over the last week: * while the proper way to address the issue at hand is to change or replace the macros shipped with systemd; * given that such a process would require more time than we have available before Fedora and RHEL users are affected; * there is no strong objection to libvirt adopting the solution that I've implemented as a temporary measure. Based on the above and the fact that the series is now fully ACKed, I will push it before the end of the day so that it can be part of rc2. Please shout if you have a problem with this plan! -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
