On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:53:17AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 12:10:03PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> > On 5/23/23 19:31, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > > +%if 0%{?fedora} >= 39
> > > + # numad is retired in fedora 39+, upstream is dead
> > > + %define with_numad 0
> > > +%endif
> >
> > Actually, it was just added back:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11445
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/numad/c/e0d0e47bbdabc8d915a61796e2e027d89d454c6e?branch=rawhide
> >
> > So maybe we will need to revert this? Or we may pretend that we never
> > saw that and just carry on. I doubt numad had any users (I mean, from
> > libvirt users group).
Luckily this was never pushed so we don't need to take any action,
but just in case I'll leave an explicit
NACK
here.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
