Re: [PATCH] spec: Drop numad usage on fedora 39+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 12:10:03PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 5/23/23 19:31, Cole Robinson wrote:
numad is removed from Fedora 39. Upstream is dead

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/numad/c/a6bb891e8447e3b2a4c63774da94ad0d9b4ee50a?branch=rawhide
https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/4990#comment-857670

Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

This powers vcpu and numatune placement='auto'. Anyone know if that's
being actively used in kubevirt, openstack, etc?

 libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
index 1f77cd90b7..5f267a086b 100644
--- a/libvirt.spec.in
+++ b/libvirt.spec.in
@@ -173,6 +173,10 @@
         %define with_numad    0%{!?_without_numad:1}
     %endif
 %endif
+%if 0%{?fedora} >= 39
+    # numad is retired in fedora 39+, upstream is dead
+    %define with_numad        0
+%endif

Actually, it was just added back:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11445

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/numad/c/e0d0e47bbdabc8d915a61796e2e027d89d454c6e?branch=rawhide

So maybe we will need to revert this? Or we may pretend that we never
saw that and just carry on. I doubt numad had any users (I mean, from
libvirt users group).


I have never seen your e-mail that mentions this.  Yes, I'm talking
about the one I am replying to right here.  That e-mail never existed.

Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux